Canada's BEST and WORST Mobile-based Online Brokerage Experiences
Questrade continues to provide the Best Mobile-based Investing experience for Canadian Self-Directed Investors
Canadian Online Brokerage firms have different approaches when it comes to providing self-directed investors with mobile-based platforms. The newest approach, and hopefully not the industry's future stance, is to provide self-directed investors with transactional-based mobile platforms with basic account and market information. The result is traditional account management, educational material, and the deeper investment information to form investment strategies must be performed on the desktop platform. The result is that for a self-directed investor to receive the best digital experiences, the investor is forced to use both handheld devices and desktops.
The two-platform trend is both puzzling and confusing, and the struggle is understanding the why. Could it be to save money? Could it simply be laziness on the part of management teams? Or is it simply a misconception of the new investors' wants and needs or are the firms trying to shape those needs, knowing that the rookie investor doesn't know any better? Whatever the reason, and in our opinion, the needs of an unassuming rookie investor are not being met and the current and long-standing customers are the ones paying for the new approach.
The firms think you want to do everything on your phone, and despite the larger sizes these days, the firms are giving you LESS and LESS. If you want the full experience you deserve, you must be willing to use the two-platform approach at most firms today.
Glenn LaCoste, President and CEO of Surviscor GroupGo to Review Breakdown
Go to Why the Surviscor Reviews are Different
Go to The Storylines
Go to Results by Firm Type
Go to Full Rankings
Review Insights
The Mobile Brokerage Review was introduced in 2015 and explores a typical mobile device-based self-directed investor experience, including both the pre-login and login areas, that evaluates the mobile journey through each investor process and typical investor experience.
For the third straight year, QUESTRADE provides the best overall mobile-based self-directed discount brokerage investor experience through its layered platforms, designed to allow an investor to move along the self-directed investing growth cycle. Conversely, for the third straight year, WEATHSIMPLE TRADE provides the worst overall experience amongst rated firms due to its mainly transactional platform which, unlike QUESTRADE, does not offer a self-directed investor much opportunity for self-growth.
2022 Was a Busy Development Year
It was nice to see some life at several firms in 2022 and it should run into 2023 as several releases are pending. In terms of new or re-designed platforms, BMO INVESTORLINE, CIBC and SCOTIABANK made some moves and NATIONAL BANK DIRECT BROKERAGE and QTRADE DIRECT INVESTING are on the cusp of new platforms.
APP Stores Tell the Story - Or Do They?
Part of the mobile brokerage analysis is to visit the two App stores and look at the releases over the past years. The Apple App Store provides a year of data while the Google Play Store shows the last release and they both indicate the user ratings of Apps. What we learned was that release records indicate that most firms simply record bugs and usability fixes throughout the year which means no real features and functionality improvements.
Firms Talking Biometrics Instead of Investments
When are firms going to stop highlighting Face ID and Fingerprint access to apps as some ground-breaking feature? The misrepresentation is that the firms are the ones who drive this technology while it really depends on the mobile device. Don't get us wrong, these are good features and should be offered at each firm, but they should not replace key investment process features and functionality.
Account Opening Pullback on Mobile
The self-directed brokerage industry is often defined as an ultra-competitive landscape where firms try very hard to retain current customers while trying to attract the new investor. Opening a new account is a process and obviously an important process for new investors. The head-scratcher is that the firms are focused on new investors who they say live on mobile devices but the trend, mainly at bank-owned firms, is to remove pre-login mobile-based account opening processes to go along with scaled-down mobile-based designs.
How Surviscor Evaluates the Firms
The 2022 Surviscor Canadian Mobile Brokerage Experience Review audited 13 Canadian Online Brokers and removed 2 firms from the rankings due to non-mobilized platforms. In each case, the review explores a typical mobile-based online brokerage investing experience, including both the pre-login and secure login areas. The audit took place in October 2022 and evaluated each firm over 6 experience categories, including 28 sub-categories, evaluating just shy of 400 individual usage criteria based on 3900-plus objective questions per firm.
MOBILE EXPERIENCE BREAKDOWN
Category | Sub-Categories | # of Criteria | # of Questions |
---|---|---|---|
INITIAL EXPERIENCE | Onboarding Experience, Service Availability, Usability Experience, Market Information, Public Resources | 89 | 1008 |
USER EXPERIENCE | User Protection, Customization Experience, Navigational Design, Product Availability | 50 | 428 |
ACCOUNT EXPERIENCE | Applications & Forms, Relationship Services, Account Information, Account Management, Account Notifications | 78 | 573 |
MARKET ANALYSIS EXPERIENCE | Quote Services, Market Information, Charting & Technical Analysis, Research & Fundamental Analysis | 53 | 585 |
TRANSACTIONAL EXPERIENCE | Equity/ETFs Trading, Options Trading, Mutual Funds Trading, Fixed Income Trading, Global Equity Trading, Other Transactions | 42 | 415 |
MOBILE RESOURCES | Screening Tools, Market Notifications, Planning Resources, Educational Resources | 85 | 921 |
Click here for a more in-depth explanation of each category and sub-category.
Why Surviscor Reviews Are Different
The Surviscor Experience Reviews are the largest and most unbiased evaluations in North America and known for uncompromised facts, and truth, about true customer experiences and online journeys. The differentiation between Surviscor reviews, other review and ranking firms, and individuals who claim to cover the Canadian consumer banking and online brokerage industries, is that Surviscor reviews are based on facts, and a lot of them, not on subjective, and often firm-sponsored or limited sample size results that are unfortunately all over the internet.
Question your status-quo, explore alternative relationships and beware the marketing messages that typically are based on such minor, and usually insignificant, differentiators.
Glenn LaCoste, President and CEO of Surviscor GroupThe Storylines
We have all heard of the saying 'no two things are created equal' and the 2022 edition of the annual Surviscor Canadian Mobile-based Online Brokerage rankings demonstrates the validity of the saying. At first glance, placing a trade is a placing a trade. The truth is, there are many differences and Canadians should take notice. Not every stock or ETF transaction experience is the same. The best firms consider each investing process from end to end and maximize the overall experience with supporting features to enhance the functionality and investment journey. The sad reality is that a good portion of Canadian Online Brokerage firms provide very basic mobile-based functionality which downgrades the overall mobile brokerage usage experiences.
The Theme Remains the Same - Less is More
We know we sound like a broken record but as industry firms finally catch-up with improved look and feel designs, less mobile-based features and functionality is a fact.
Is Usage That Low That Nobody Cares?
App Store release records indicate that bugs are the main release items. Bugs are errors with the platform and are typically generated by users. So, if there are bugs every month and a lack of new features, does it mean that usage is up and there's no time or do firms simply not care to improve the whole experience?
Say Goodbye to Free Pre-Login Quotes
There was a day, and not too long ago, that leading firms provided access to free market data prior to a mobile-based login. The newest releases indicate that trend to login pages versus pre-login information. Yet another example of takeaways versus additions
BMO INVESTORLINE Grade: B
We have been tough on BMO INVESTORLINE over the past years because we remember the firm that use to dominate the industry. The much-anticipated re-release is a welcomed sight, and our grade is based on a new and improved design based on the older features and functionality. The reason the grade doesn't get an A is that, sadly, the new release removed some key investing experience items.
CIBC INVESTOR'S EDGE Grade: C
The good news is that CIBC INVESTOR'S EDGE is making changes. The disappointing news is that the recent changes have not improved the overall mobile-based experience. Like it's industry peers, the grade misses the next level due to the removal of items, in this case, a slew of pre-login features.
SCOTIA iTRADE Grade: D
To be completely transparent, our SCOTIA iTRADE grade is based on an extra factor that we don't usually consider but felt we couldn't ignore. The App Store reviews are horrible for the recent re-release and customers should take note. We are not surprised as this is what parent SCOTIABANK, sadly, has been up to for years. Re-release once industry-leading platforms with scaled-down features and functionality that anger current customers.
Mobile Brokerage Experience Rankings - By Firm Types
The Canadian Online Brokerage landscape is not very big but is split between bank-owned firms and independent firms. Whatever your preference, here's a look at the best and worst firms in each segment:
BANK-OWNED FIRMS - RANKINGS
Industry Ranking | Brokerage Firm | Experience Score | Firm Likes & Dislikes |
---|---|---|---|
2 | BMO INVESTORLINE | 73 % | See Likes & Dislikes |
3 | TD DIRECT INVESTING | 69 % | See Likes & Dislikes |
4 | NATIONAL BANK DIRECT BROKERAGE | 63 % | See Likes & Dislikes |
6 | CIBC INVESTOR's EDGE | 60 % | See Likes & Dislikes |
7 | RBC DIRECT INVESTING | 57 % | See Likes & Dislikes |
10 | SCOTIA iTRADE | 47 % | See Likes & Dislikes |
No Mobile | HSBC INVESTDIRECT | n/a | See Likes & Dislikes |
No Mobile | LAURENTIAN BANK DISCOUNT BROKERAGE | n/a | See Likes & Dislikes |
Bank-owned firms account for five of the top seven rankings when the focus is on mobile-based platforms. BMO INVESTORLINE is the top ranked bank-owned firm but not completely attributed to its long awaited new mobile platform release. The new look and feel is a bonus for sure but the fact that some features and functionalities were taken away is concerning. TD DIRECT INVESTING rounds out the top three in 2022 based on its traditional platform not its newest TD EasyTrade scaled-down platform.
In terms of the other bank-owned firms, NATIONAL BANK DIRECT BROKERAGE is still succeeding with its mobilized platform and has plans to release a true mobile platform soon. CIBC INVESTOR'S EDGE made some real feature and functionality changes in the past year and RBC DIRECT INVESTING continues its development sleep mode. SCOTIA iTRADE, who use to be the cat's meow in this arena and now sits in the worst ranking, did introduce a newly designed platform in the past year but it proved to be disappointing like most of its parent-company SCOTIABANK's digital development initiatives in the past few years. Something needs to give at Scotia iTRADE.
Bank-owned firms are no longer defining best practice development trends like they use to. Today they seem to be chasing the new investor that rose in dominance during COVID, like the firms who don't have the customer base, rather than continually improving the current customer base experience.
Glenn LaCoste, President and CEO of Surviscor GroupNON-BANK FIRMS - RANKINGS
Industry Ranking | Banking Firm | Experience Score | Firm Likes & Dislikes |
---|---|---|---|
1 | QUESTRADE | 74 % | See Likes & Dislikes |
5 | QTRADE DIRECT INVESTING | 62 % | See Likes & Dislikes |
8 | DESJARDINS ONLINE BROKERAGE | 55 % | See Likes & Dislikes |
9 | CI DIRECT TRADING | 54 % | See Likes & Dislikes |
11 | WEALTHSIMPLE TRADE | 35 % | See Likes & Dislikes |
Not Rated | CG DIRECT | n/a | See Likes & Dislikes |
Not Rated | INTERACTIVE BROKERS | n/a | See Likes & Dislikes |
History has shown that firms do not need to be bank-owned to succeed in the online brokerage self-directed investing arena. QUESTRADE, who currently runs two investor platforms, is at the top of the mobile-based rankings due to its traditional platform not its new scaled-down QuestMobile platform. The traditional platform provides a more comprehensive investor experience and is far ahead of its non-bank owned peers. QTRADE DIRECT INVESTING will be introducing a new platform soon which hopefully is not scaled-back, but time will tell. WEALTHSIMPLE TRADE is the lowest ranked non-bank firm for the third straight year as its mobile-based offering is simply not adequate for a true self-directed investor.
Non-bank firms had traditionally performed well but now appear to be in a race to gain the new investor with oversimplified platforms while ignoring the customers who made them who they are.
Glenn LaCoste, President and CEO of Surviscor GroupCOMPLETE RESULTS - All Firms under Review
Mobile Experience Rank | Brokerage Firm | Experience Score | View Company Review |
---|---|---|---|
1 | QUESTRADE | 74 % | See Likes & Dislikes |
2 | BMO INVESTORLINE | 73 % | See Likes & Dislikes |
3 | TD DIRECT INVESTING | 69 % | See Likes & Dislikes |
4 | NATIONAL BANK DIRECT BROKERAGE | 63 % | See Likes & Dislikes |
5 | QTRADE DIRECT INVESTING | 62 % | See Likes & Dislikes |
6 | CIBC INVESTOR's EDGE | 60 % | See Likes & Dislikes |
7 | RBC DIRECT INVESTING | 57 % | See Likes & Dislikes |
8 | DESJARDINS ONLINE BROKERAGE | 55 % | See Likes & Dislikes |
9 | CI DIRECT TRADING | 54 % | See Likes & Dislikes |
10 | SCOTIA iTRADE | 47 % | See Likes & Dislikes |
11 | WEALTHSIMPLE TRADE | 35 % | See Likes & Dislikes |
No Mobile | HSBC INVESTDIRECT | n/a | See Likes & Dislikes |
No Mobile | LAURENTIAN BANK DISCOUNT BROKERAGE | n/a | See Likes & Dislikes |
Not Rated | CG DIRECT | n/a | See Likes & Dislikes |
Not Rated | INTERACTIVE BROKERS | n/a | See Likes & Dislikes |
The low mobile-based online brokerage scores are a sign of less than great mobile-based platforms. The reality is that, in most cases, self-directed investors cannot rely solely on mobile devices alone to optimize their overall investing experience.
Surviscor TeamThe Afterthought
Keep in mind that the depth of the Surviscor reviews means an environment of tough marking and firms being required to earn their rankings not be given them by ghost writers or false marketing messages. In addition to being tough, Surviscor will also give credit where credit is due, and you can trust that the money Canadians work hard to make is being considered by identifying the premier online brokerage partners who deserve consideration. The hope is that all Canadians hold each firm accountable to the highest standards of customer experience.
Learn More about the Canadian Online Brokerage Industry
Best Online Brokers Rankings: Canada's Best and Worst Online Brokerage Firms
Commissions and Fees Experience Rankings: Canada's Best and Worst Online Brokerage Commissions and Fees Experiences
Service Experience Rankings: Canada's Best and Worst Online Brokerage Service Experiences
Online Platform Experience Rankings: Canada's Best and Worst Online-based Brokerage Experiences
Explore other Surviscor Rankings
This review is only one of many Surviscor yearly digital experience reviews for Online Self-Directed Brokerage and Consumer Banking firms. Take a look at your current firms, firms you always thought about using, and maybe you'll even find a new firm to consider.
Online Brokerage Reviews
Check out the latest Surviscor Self-Directed DIY Online Brokerage Investor Rankings